OSHAWA
January 25, 2010
Dear Constituent:
Since the Prime Minister announced his
intention to prorogue Parliament and introduce a new Throne
Speech and Federal Budget during the first week of March, I have
received a number of letters, emails and phone calls from
constituents expressing their disappointment over this decision.
I appreciate that some constituents may have strong views on
this matter. As one of my constituents you have every right to
know where I stand on this issue. I would like to take just a
few moments to address the most frequently asked questions I
have received from Oshawa residents.
“Why did the Prime Minister do this?”
The Prime Minister stated that proroguing will allow the
government to ‘re-calibrate’ its agenda and properly prepare a
new and very important budget for Canadians. Despite the success
of the Economic Action Plan, Canada has had to increase its
spending and run short-term deficits. The Government is seeking
an additional 22 days to consult with Canadians to ensure we
stay on track. As you are reading this letter, the Finance
Minister and other government officials are crossing the country
to gather Canadians’ input.
As a minority Government we are expected to work with other
parties in Parliament. I was initially pleased when our
government’s ‘tough on crime’ legislation passed unanimously in
the House of Commons. We were disheartened when Liberal Senators
defied the will of their party and gutted this legislation. In
this respect, proroguing Parliament was necessary to establish a
new legislative session and enable a rebalancing of several
Senate committees. Had Parliament not prorogued, key Senate
Committees will continue to hold up the Government’s agenda.
Recent history has shown that the Senate is unwilling to enact
legislation as passed by the House of Commons – even to the
frustration of the opposition parties at times.
Several constituents have commented that because Canadians did
not give the Conservatives a majority in the last election, the
appointment of new Senators defies the will of the electorate.
In fairness, though, Canadians did not elect a Liberal majority
or minority government either. In October 2008, Canadians
elected a minority Conservative government. Yet, the Liberal
senators continue to act as if there is a Liberal majority
government. They continue to obstruct Government legislation at
nearly every opportunity. We feel this is unacceptable to all
Members of the House of Commons who are working together to get
things done for all Canadians.
Believe me; we would prefer to have Senators elected to fixed
terms. Yet, the stark reality facing our Government is this: In
order for the Senate to reflect the Government the people of
Canada elected, and to pass legislation, it must be reorganized.
In the near term, we must return parity and fairness to the
Senate with any future appointments. With the Prime Minister’s
upcoming selections, we may finally have the votes in the upper
chamber to enact meaningful Senate reform.
“Parliament was prorogued because of the Afghan detainee
issue.”
Despite the claims of the opposition, proroguing Parliament will
not allow the Conservatives to ‘dodge’ questions on the Afghan
detainee issue. A new session does not remove the requirement
for the tabling of orders or reports in the House of Commons.
Similarly, the Government's obligation to respond to committee
reports and petitions on this issue continues to stand.
“Proroguing Parliament is unusual and undemocratic.”
No; proroguing Parliament is not unusual or undemocratic. Former
Liberal Prime Ministers, Jean Chrétien and Paul Martin prorogued
Parliament four times. Furthermore, a typical Parliament is
composed of several sessions and therefore includes several
Throne Speeches. On average there are three or four Throne
Speeches per Parliament, although some Parliaments have heard as
many as six or seven. Despite the claims of the opposition, the
decision to launch a new Throne Speech with the same Parliament
is routine, having occurred 104 times in the past.
“You’ve shut down Government. What’s not getting done in
Ottawa?”
Government continues to operate for significant periods each
year without Parliament sitting – as it does during summer,
Christmas, and election periods. When Parliament is not sitting,
MPs continue to work in their ridings. Certainly, you will
notice some changes:
• The most visible change will be the delay of daily Question
Period until early March. You can judge for yourself if this
delay will have a serious impact on Canadians’ daily life. Like
you, my colleagues and I are often disgusted by level of
acrimony, insults and cheap rhetoric hurled around during
Question Period, most of it designed to gain headlines or
embarrass others.
• A delay of various House Committee meetings, usually two per
week.
• Regional and national weekly caucus meetings have been
replaced by a national caucus meeting which will take place
weekly in Ottawa.
“You’re on an extended vacation. You don’t work if you’re not
in Ottawa.”
Not true. MPs do schedule vacation time away, usually around
Christmas or during summer. When the House is not sitting, MPs
are in their constituencies working – even on weekends and
holidays. It is what you pay us to do. This is what I do. Here
is a sample my activities when not in Ottawa:
1. Meet
constituents and local organization – I receive frequent
requests from constituents or organizations to asking to visit
with me in person. Ironically, when MPs are in Ottawa doing
their job, they are often accused of hiding from their
constituents. You simply can’t please everyone at all times.
2.
Advocacy/project work – Whether I am in Ottawa or Oshawa, I work
aggressively to advance Oshawa’s interests in Ottawa. In 2009,
our government returned an unprecedented level of your federal
tax dollars back to Oshawa riding in the form of new programs
and major infrastructure investments. We also created the
Southern Ontario Development Program (SODP) which will invest $1
billion over 5 years into Southern Ontario, particularly in
economically hard-hit areas like Oshawa and Durham Region. I am
currently seeking new proposals which may qualify under this
program.
3. Budget planning – As I write, the Finance Minister
is preparing the 2010 Budget. I have requested input from
community stakeholders and will prepare Oshawa-specific
recommendations for his consideration.
4. Functions – As
the MP, you may be surprised at the number of events I am asked
to attend in the community. I could receive many as 20-30
invitations per week. While I cannot accept every invitation, I
do my best to attend as many events and meet with as many
constituents as possible.
“This is a dictatorial Prime Minister. MPs can’t speak their
mind.”
Since my election in 2004, I have had the opportunity to work
with Stephen Harper as Opposition Leader and Prime Minister. I
consider him to be a very honourable, talented and insightful
individual who makes every effort to balance the rights of the
person with the obligations of the state. I have always worked
well with Mr. Harper and have never found myself in a position
where I was unable to speak my mind or accurately represent our
community’s interests and concerns. Mr. Harper is a serious,
no-nonsense person with a decisive and clear vision for Canada.
In this time of global economic turmoil, with the potential for
American protectionism looming, I am thankful that he is our
Prime Minister.
If you are not a fan of our Prime Minister, our Government – or
even me for that matter – I may be unable to change your
perspective. But given that several constituents have asked for
my thoughts on Parliament, I am hopeful that this letter
provides another perspective on these recent events. With a new
Budget just ahead of us, I am confident that Canada will be
among the first countries to exit the global recession and be
better-positioned to take full advantage of the opportunities in
front of us.
I am grateful for your time and consideration. If you would like
to speak further, please do not hesitate to contact me by
email or by telephone at 905-440-4868.
Yours sincerely,
Colin